THE
 American Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, on being told that 
imperialism’s ‘revolutionaries’ organised in the Libyan Transitional 
Council, NTC, had captured and killed Moammar Gaddafi in Sirte, tried an
 uneducated re-interpretation of Julius Ceasar’s famous quote: “Veni, 
vidi, vici”, which translates from Latin to: “I came, I saw, I 
conquered”.
Clinton’s
 naked gloating over the public lynching of America’s old adversary 
revealed the depravity of the leading politicians of the imperialist 
world, while underlining the length they will go to achieve their 
imperial aims in the contemporary world.
It
 was clear that NATO’s “Operation Unified Protector” was not about 
implementing UN Resolution 1973, but as Thierry Meyssan, writing for Voltaire.org
 said, was “to overthrow a political system and to kill the leader, even
 if the assassination of a serving head of state is strictly prohibited 
by US law and universally condemned”.
It
 was also clear that NATO was not really enthusiastic about handing 
Gaddafi over to the ICC, because it was unlikely to be able to sentence 
him for crimes against humanity, anymore than the Criminal Tribunal for 
Yugoslavia was able to prove its case against former Serbian leader, 
Slobodan Milosevic, after two years of prosecution.
The
 imperialist media parroted the same set of accusations against Gaddafi 
over and over, giving an indication that there was really little 
incriminating evidence which could hold in a court, against the man. One
 of the most repeated accusations was that he stashed away billions of 
dollars, but none of the imperialist countries: France, Britain or the 
USA that bunched together with their Gulf clients like the feudal 
Emirate of Qatar, was able to track the alleged fortune of the Gaddafi 
clan.
Money
 seized in the course of the criminal aggression against Libya, belonged
 to the Libyan state, not Muammar Gaddafi. Interestingly, the only 
international arrest warrant against Gaddafi before the NATO aggression 
was issued by Interpol. He had been accused by Lebanon of having killed 
Imam Moussa Sadr and a group of companions in 1978.
The
 imperialist media was silent on that warrant, because the kidnapping of
 Imam Sadr had been sponsored by the United States which wanted to get 
rid of the Imam, to prevent the spread of the radicalism which Ayatollah
 Khomeini had inspired in the Middle East.
The
 imperialist media similarly conveniently ignored the role which Gaddafi
 played in the political life of countries like France, where Gaddafi 
illegally financed the presidential election campaigns of Nicholas 
Sarkozy and Segolene Royal. We must not forget that deeply ingrained in 
imperialist politics is immorality and gluttony.
The
 same characters that sponsored the destruction of Libyan infrastructure
 had been lining up to kiss Gaddafi’s hand in order to secure lucrative 
oil deals a few years ago as well as outsourcing to his security forces,
 the torture of Islamists.
And
 as soon as the puppets of the NTC were knocked together, discussions 
emerged in imperial centres about the privatization of Libyan assets.
They
 want to parcel out oil concessions, take over the ports and banks as 
well as other infrastructure. Libya will become a dependent protectorate
 and a NATO bridgehead for all sorts of aggression against African and 
Middle Eastern interests.
I
 have never admired Gaddafi, who I think lived far more on the lunatic 
fringe to be able to understand the fundamental necessities for the 
revolutionary change that Africa required. He was too eclectic in his 
actions and too befuddled in his thoughts. He supported national 
liberation movements in Southern Africa alright, but was also the 
sponsor of bandits like Charles Taylor and Foday Sankoh. He was forever 
attempting to annex the Aozou Strip of Chad and in one of his most 
unforgivable crimes ever, he stormed a plane in Tripoli, arrested the 
leaders of the Sudan Communist Party and handed them over to another 
lunatic like himself, Gafar Numeiri, for execution, in 1971! He was 
forever blowing hot and cold and ran a most personalised regime which 
alienated the people and did not allow the development of the Libyan 
state; Gaddafi was the state! Nevertheless, despite all the imperialist 
media’s attempt to delegitimize him totally, they could not erase the 
most important of his achievements. He overthrew the puppet monarchy 
which had been imposed by imperialism after the Second World War; he 
removed imperialist troops from bases in Libya; nationalized Libyan oil 
to serve the interests of Libyans as well as giving aid to impoverished 
African countries; constructed the Great Man-Made River (the largest 
irrigation project on earth). Thierry Meyssan said: “Libya’s development
 aid was more important than all the G20 countries put together”. Well, 
as Hilary Clinton vulgarly declared, they went, they saw and he died. 
But imperialism will not have the last word in history!
Those
 who accepted the NATO aggression against Libya and the public lynching 
of Moammar Gaddafi must remember the way that French troops also 
publicly defied Ivorian sovereignty a few months back, to invade the 
Abidjan presidential palace, to capture the recalcitrant Laurent Gbagbo.
 These are markers of the new imperialist attitude in Africa. The 
Americans have been shopping for bases to locate AFRICOM, the forward 
operational arm for Africa’s re-colonization. It has been unpopular in 
the continent. But the new theory of linkage between AQIM, Al-Shabaab 
and Boko Haram, is becoming the red herring to interfere even more 
vigorously in African affairs.
New secret bases
They
 are planning new secret bases to launch drones against targets in 
Africa and already, they have been used against targets in Somalia, from
 secret bases in Yemen and Djibouti. West Africa will be targeted from 
secret bases in southern Algeria and with the imposition of a puppet 
regime in Libya, that country will enter the loop.
In
 the long run, there is also the underlining rivalry between the old 
imperialist powers and the emergent nations, such as China, for Africa’s
 natural resources. The Chinese method of offering infrastructural 
development, non-interference plus mineral deals, became popular with 
African ruling elites, to the chagrin of the Western countries, long 
used to a monopoly of exploitation of African resources.
The
 battle for the economic domination of the world of the 21 Century will 
increasingly be fought on the African continent. Robert Mugabe echoed 
this concern in the just concluded AU summit. Though one can hastily 
discredit Mugabe's Concerns when you take his track record of governance
 into consideration. but as the saying goes "There is a little sense in 
every nonsense.
when
 one sees the way our governments are quick in washing our dirty linens 
just for financial aids, selling our national sovereignty for a few 
million dollars. if the founding fathers ran to the west thee way our 
government today do, maybe there wouldn't be anything left to govern 
today. Maybe our leaders need Murtala Mohammed to come back from the 
dead and make the "Africa has come of age" Speech.
Of
 course, imperialism will exploit slogans about democracy and human 
right, to try to claim the upper hand in that battle, because Africans 
want democracy and a respect for our human rights.
But
 the history of slavery, colonialism and neo-colonialism, show that in 
the long run, imperialism cannot defend the values of Africa. God help us all.


1 comments:
the president of senegal is busy spending 200000 dollars his country doesn't have on lobbying the americans to support his tenure elongation